Roland Garros ATP: Stan Wawrinka vs Arthur Fils

Platform comparison

Active sub-markets

Market context

Arthur Fils is still priced as the clear favourite to beat Stan Wawrinka at Roland Garros, with the market sitting at 14% for Wawrinka. That aligns with the latest pre-match view rather than any late swing in form: French openers at this level usually move only when there is a draw change, a fitness update, or a confirmed scheduling issue. Roland-Garros has listed the pair for the men’s singles first round, and Robinhood’s event page currently shows Fils at 87¢ against Wawrinka at 14¢, while pre-match betting lines reported by Bleacher Nation have Fils around -800 and Wawrinka +500.

The current pricing reflects two familiar tournament dynamics: a top-20 player against a veteran wildcard, and a best-of-five match on clay, where youth and physical load matter more if the contest becomes prolonged. Wawrinka still has enough quality to trouble elite opponents in patches, but at 41 his route is usually through short spells of high-level shot-making rather than sustained pressure over five sets. Fils, ranked 19 in the cited preview, brings the heavier baseline profile and home-crowd support, which is typically enough to keep a market like this anchored unless something materially changes.

The main catalysts to watch are simple: whether the match is kept on schedule, whether either player is ruled out or withdraws, and whether any medical timeout or retirement situation occurs once play starts. Roland-Garros and the betting venues are also the key sources for format updates, as the market rules hinge on whether the match is played, completed, or abandoned. If there is no result within seven days of the original date, or the match is not played at all, the contract would settle 50-50; otherwise, an in-play winner should determine the outcome.

Sources: 1 · 2 · 3 · 4 · 5

Methodology

Methodologically we separate two layers: the live probability (Polymarket mid-price) and the platform attributes (fee, KYC, settlement currency, payment rails). The odds column is filled only where we have clean data — that avoids the made-up numbers that get a network demoted when search engines cross-check against the source venue.

Resolution & payout

At resolution the UMA oracle takes over: a proposer posts the outcome with a bond, any token holder can dispute within two hours. Without dispute the result is accepted and the smart contract distributes USDC instantly.

On Kalshi (CFTC-regulated) resolution runs through their in-house clearing engine in USD. Betfair Exchange settles after match end in the account's local currency. Manifold pays no cash — only its in-platform "mana" currency.

FAQ

Is this market available outside the US?

PolyGram is available in most jurisdictions where Polymarket isn't directly accessible. Polymarket itself is geo-blocked in the US/UK/EU. Always check local regulations.

What's the difference between YES and NO shares?

A YES share pays $1.00 if the event happens, $0 otherwise. A NO share pays $1.00 if the event doesn't happen. The market price between 0¢ and 100¢ is the implied probability.

What does it cost to trade on PolyGram?

Zero. PolyGram routes every order to the live Polymarket order book; the only cost is the Polygon network fee, typically under $0.01 per transaction.

How fast are USDC deposits?

Polygon credits deposits after 12 confirmations — usually under 30 seconds. Withdrawals follow the same path and land back in your wallet within minutes.

Do I need to KYC for this market?

Not under $1,500 of lifetime trading volume. Above that threshold, PolyGram triggers a quick verification flow that finishes in minutes.