HSBC Championships: Brandon Nakashima vs Francisco Cerundolo

Platform comparison

Active sub-markets

Market context

The scheduled HSBC Championships window has already passed, and the available tournament listings show the event running in mid-June rather than on 20 June, so the immediate issue for this market is whether the Nakashima-Cerúndolo match ever materialised on the published Queen’s Club schedule.[1][2][5] With the crowd-implied probability at 0% YES, the market is effectively pricing in either a non-occurrence, an unresolved match, or a result already absent from the official order of play rather than a live competitive outcome.[3][4][8]

That framing matters because prediction markets on tennis often gap hard when a match is removed from the schedule, especially on grass, where late withdrawals and same-day reshuffles are more common than in fixed-draw events. Queen’s Club is an ATP 500 grass-court stop, and the 2026 men’s tournament is listed for 15–21 June, which makes a 20 June singles meeting plausible in principle but dependent on the draw and day-by-day order of play.[2][5][7] Comparable cases usually resolve on whether the players are officially listed, whether a ball is struck, and whether the fixture is completed within the stated delay window, not on pre-event expectations.[3][8]

For traders, the key catalysts are the daily order of play, late withdrawal notices, and any official scoreline feed confirming start, suspension, retirement, or walkover. Queen’s Club coverage is being published through the LTA and WTA/ATP channels, while tennis listings and schedules are also being carried by ESPN and Tennis Channel distribution, so any update there would be the clearest signal that the market should move off 0%.[1][3][4][5] If no official match appears and the seven-day settlement clock passes without a winner, the market’s tie rule becomes the practical fallback.

Sources: 1 · 2 · 3 · 4 · 5

Methodology

Methodologically we separate two layers: the live probability (Polymarket mid-price) and the platform attributes (fee, KYC, settlement currency, payment rails). The odds column is filled only where we have clean data — that avoids the made-up numbers that get a network demoted when search engines cross-check against the source venue.

Resolution & payout

Settlement runs on-chain. Polymarket's contract logic separates YES and NO shares as conditional tokens; at resolution the winning share lifts to $1.00 and the losing one to $0. The outcome input comes from the UMA Optimistic Oracle, which secures against bad resolution with a bond + dispute window.

Once finalised, the smart contract pays USDC to the holders' wallets within minutes — no withdrawal fees beyond Polygon network gas. Kalshi settles in USD via CFTC clearance, Betfair in account currency net of commission, Manifold in play-money mana with no cash-out.

FAQ

What's the difference between YES and NO shares?

A YES share pays $1.00 if the event happens, $0 otherwise. A NO share pays $1.00 if the event doesn't happen. The market price between 0¢ and 100¢ is the implied probability.

What does it cost to trade on Prediction Today?

Zero. Prediction Today routes every order to the live Polymarket order book; the only cost is the Polygon network fee, typically under $0.01 per transaction.

How fast are USDC deposits?

Polygon credits deposits after 12 confirmations — usually under 30 seconds. Withdrawals follow the same path and land back in your wallet within minutes.

Do I need to KYC for this market?

Not under $1,500 of lifetime trading volume. Above that threshold, Prediction Today triggers a quick verification flow that finishes in minutes.

How reliable are the quoted odds?

The YES/NO percentages are the live mid-prices of the Polymarket order book. On deep markets they move every few seconds; on thinner ones you'll see short plateaus.