Wimbledon, Qualification ATP: Francesco Maestrelli vs Max Basing

Platform comparison

Active sub-markets

Market context

Francesco Maestrelli and Max Basing are scheduled to meet in Wimbledon qualifying on Court 3, and live listings now show the match in play rather than merely on the order of play, which is the main change over the last day or two. FanDuel lists the meeting for 22 June, while BBC’s live Wimbledon qualifying coverage also places Maestrelli against Basing on Court 3 in the men’s draw.[2][3]

That makes the current **0% YES** crowd view look inconsistent with a live first-round qualifying fixture, since this is a standard best-of-three-set match where a winner is normally determined on the day. Comparable Wimbledon qualifying ties usually settle by outright completion, with only cancellations, long delays, or unfinished matches pushing markets towards split resolution rather than a normal winner. The Olympics.com qualifying schedule notes the men’s event runs across 22–25 June for three rounds, so there is little room in the calendar for a prolonged holdover.[4]

The main trader watchpoints are match status, court progress, and any weather or scheduling disruption at the All England Club. If the contest has already started, the key question is whether play reaches a completed result before the market’s 29 June settlement window closes; if it is abandoned or pushed back beyond seven days without a winner, the market rules point to 50-50 instead. Live score services and broadcaster updates are the fastest indicators here, because Wimbledon qualifying can move quickly once a court opens up.[6][8]

Sources: 1 · 2 · 3 · 4 · 5

Methodology

Methodologically we separate two layers: the live probability (Polymarket mid-price) and the platform attributes (fee, KYC, settlement currency, payment rails). The odds column is filled only where we have clean data — that avoids the made-up numbers that get a network demoted when search engines cross-check against the source venue.

Resolution & payout

Settlement runs on-chain. Polymarket's contract logic separates YES and NO shares as conditional tokens; at resolution the winning share lifts to $1.00 and the losing one to $0. The outcome input comes from the UMA Optimistic Oracle, which secures against bad resolution with a bond + dispute window.

Once finalised, the smart contract pays USDC to the holders' wallets within minutes — no withdrawal fees beyond Polygon network gas. Kalshi settles in USD via CFTC clearance, Betfair in account currency net of commission, Manifold in play-money mana with no cash-out.

FAQ

Where can I trade this market with the lowest fees?

On Prediction Today, which mirrors the Polymarket order book at 0% fees. Kalshi charges up to 7% per trade; Betfair Exchange takes 2-5% commission on net winnings.

What's the difference between YES and NO shares?

A YES share pays $1.00 if the event happens, $0 otherwise. A NO share pays $1.00 if the event doesn't happen. The market price between 0¢ and 100¢ is the implied probability.

What does it cost to trade on Prediction Today?

Zero. Prediction Today routes every order to the live Polymarket order book; the only cost is the Polygon network fee, typically under $0.01 per transaction.

How fast are USDC deposits?

Polygon credits deposits after 12 confirmations — usually under 30 seconds. Withdrawals follow the same path and land back in your wallet within minutes.

How reliable are the quoted odds?

The YES/NO percentages are the live mid-prices of the Polymarket order book. On deep markets they move every few seconds; on thinner ones you'll see short plateaus.