Plovdiv: Tommaso Compagnucci vs Maxim Mrva

Platform comparison

Active sub-markets

Market context

The main change in the last 24–48 hours is that the Plovdiv Challenger fixture is still listed as live on tennis platforms, but the actual start time has already been pushed around, which matters more than the original schedule for a market that resolves on completion or winner advancement. SofaScore now shows the match on Court 2 with a 22 June start at 12:50 UTC, while other listings still show “tomorrow 12:30”, so traders are watching for final order-of-play confirmation rather than the original 4:00am ET slot.[3][1]

The current 100% YES pricing is consistent with a normal scheduled Challenger match between two players who are both active and already drawn into the event. Maxim Mrva is the higher-ranked player at ATP No. 287 versus Tommaso Compagnucci at No. 370, and SuperTennis also identifies Mrva as the second seed in Plovdiv, which helps explain why the market has concentrated so heavily on the named outcome rather than a cancellation scenario.[2][5] In comparable ATP Challenger markets, when a match remains on the board and receives a firm court assignment, the dominant resolution path is usually the player who actually advances, not a fallback 50-50 split.

The key catalysts from here are simple: whether the match is called to court, whether there is another delay beyond the seven-day settlement window, and whether the fixture is completed rather than interrupted. If the event is played as listed, the market should resolve to the advancing player; if it is not played at all or is pushed too far past the scheduled date without a winner, it falls to 50-50 under the market rules. For now, the practical watchpoint is the official Plovdiv order of play and any late withdrawal or walkover notice from the Challenger draw.[3][4]

Sources: 1 · 2 · 3 · 4 · 5

Methodology

Methodologically we separate two layers: the live probability (Polymarket mid-price) and the platform attributes (fee, KYC, settlement currency, payment rails). The odds column is filled only where we have clean data — that avoids the made-up numbers that get a network demoted when search engines cross-check against the source venue.

Resolution & payout

Settlement runs on-chain. Polymarket's contract logic separates YES and NO shares as conditional tokens; at resolution the winning share lifts to $1.00 and the losing one to $0. The outcome input comes from the UMA Optimistic Oracle, which secures against bad resolution with a bond + dispute window.

Once finalised, the smart contract pays USDC to the holders' wallets within minutes — no withdrawal fees beyond Polygon network gas. Kalshi settles in USD via CFTC clearance, Betfair in account currency net of commission, Manifold in play-money mana with no cash-out.

FAQ

Where can I trade this market with the lowest fees?

On Prediction Today, which mirrors the Polymarket order book at 0% fees. Kalshi charges up to 7% per trade; Betfair Exchange takes 2-5% commission on net winnings.

Is this market available outside the US?

Prediction Today is available in most jurisdictions where Polymarket isn't directly accessible. Polymarket itself is geo-blocked in the US/UK/EU. Always check local regulations.

How does resolution work?

Through the UMA Optimistic Oracle on Polygon: a proposer submits the outcome, a two-hour challenge window opens, and USDC payouts settle automatically once the result is final.

How fast are USDC deposits?

Polygon credits deposits after 12 confirmations — usually under 30 seconds. Withdrawals follow the same path and land back in your wallet within minutes.

How reliable are the quoted odds?

The YES/NO percentages are the live mid-prices of the Polymarket order book. On deep markets they move every few seconds; on thinner ones you'll see short plateaus.