Brescia: Mayar Sherif vs Elizara Yaneva

Platform comparison

Active sub-markets

Market context

Mayar Sherif and Elizara Yaneva were still listed around the Brescia clay-court event when the market data last updated, but the current **100% YES** price is only consistent with Sherif already having advanced or the match having been completed in her favour. The scheduled start times in match trackers were for 20 June, so the key change over the last day or two is not about pre-match pricing but whether an official result has already been recorded or whether the fixture slipped on to a different court time.[2][5][7]

The historical read is straightforward: Sherif was the established clay-court name and clear pre-match favourite, with bookmakers and market listings reflecting her higher ranking and stronger surface record against 19-year-old Yaneva.[1][6] Comparable WTA 125 clay matches with a strong favourite often settle cleanly if the favourite takes control early, but a market at 100% usually means the price has moved beyond opinion into confirmation, so traders should treat it as a result-status question rather than a live form call.[1][4]

The main catalysts now are official draw updates, order-of-play changes, and whether the match was completed or awarded after a walkover, retirement, or cancellation window. Live trackers still carried the fixture detail and venue information, but that does not on its own confirm the settlement outcome, so the decisive watchpoint is the tournament’s match status and any late scoring updates from the event feed or live score services.[2][5][8]

Sources: 1 · 2 · 3 · 4 · 5

Methodology

We track Brescia: Mayar Sherif vs Elizara Yaneva on the five venues with material liquidity for prediction markets. Live odds come from the Polymarket Polygon order book — the only source that ships real-time data under an open licence. For Kalshi, Betfair and Manifold we list platform attributes (fee, KYC, settlement, payment) instead of fabricated odds, because their APIs use non-comparable contract definitions.

Resolution & payout

Settlement runs on-chain. Polymarket's contract logic separates YES and NO shares as conditional tokens; at resolution the winning share lifts to $1.00 and the losing one to $0. The outcome input comes from the UMA Optimistic Oracle, which secures against bad resolution with a bond + dispute window.

Once finalised, the smart contract pays USDC to the holders' wallets within minutes — no withdrawal fees beyond Polygon network gas. Kalshi settles in USD via CFTC clearance, Betfair in account currency net of commission, Manifold in play-money mana with no cash-out.

FAQ

Where can I trade this market with the lowest fees?

On Prediction Today, which mirrors the Polymarket order book at 0% fees. Kalshi charges up to 7% per trade; Betfair Exchange takes 2-5% commission on net winnings.

What does it cost to trade on Prediction Today?

Zero. Prediction Today routes every order to the live Polymarket order book; the only cost is the Polygon network fee, typically under $0.01 per transaction.

How fast are USDC deposits?

Polygon credits deposits after 12 confirmations — usually under 30 seconds. Withdrawals follow the same path and land back in your wallet within minutes.

Do I need to KYC for this market?

Not under $1,500 of lifetime trading volume. Above that threshold, Prediction Today triggers a quick verification flow that finishes in minutes.

How reliable are the quoted odds?

The YES/NO percentages are the live mid-prices of the Polymarket order book. On deep markets they move every few seconds; on thinner ones you'll see short plateaus.