Internazionali BNL d'Italia: Coco Gauff vs Elina Svitolina

Platform comparison

Active sub-markets

Market context

Rain has pushed the women’s final at the Foro Italico back, but the match is still scheduled to be played today, with Coco Gauff and Elina Svitolina meeting for the Rome title. The immediate context is that Svitolina beat Iga Swiatek in three sets in the semi-finals, while Gauff reached the final in straight sets over Sorana Cîrstea. A 0% YES price implies the market is still treating completion as highly uncertain, rather than as a view on either player’s chances once the match starts.

On form and matchup, Svitolina brings the stronger Rome pedigree: she is a two-time champion and is chasing a third title, while Gauff is back in the final after losing here last year. Their head-to-head also favours Svitolina, who leads 3-2 and has won the last two meetings, including in Dubai this season, though this is their first meeting on clay. Gauff’s recent run has been solid but more taxing, with several three-setters in the tournament, whereas Svitolina has already shown she can handle top-tier opposition on this surface.

For traders, the key catalysts are schedule updates, court conditions and whether the final can start within the market’s settlement window. Italian coverage from SuperTennis and subsequent reports noted the delay caused by rain at the Foro Italico, with organisers still waiting to confirm a revised start time. If play is delayed materially or abandoned, the market’s 50-50 fallback becomes relevant; if it begins and a winner is eventually determined within seven days, it resolves to the advancing player.

Sources: 1 · 2 · 3 · 4 · 5

Methodology

This page is a comparison snapshot: one live quote (Polymarket), four reference venues with their key attributes, and a single execution path — every trade button routes to PolyGram, which mirrors the Polymarket order book directly.

Resolution & payout

Settlement runs on-chain. Polymarket's contract logic separates YES and NO shares as conditional tokens; at resolution the winning share lifts to $1.00 and the losing one to $0. The outcome input comes from the UMA Optimistic Oracle, which secures against bad resolution with a bond + dispute window.

Once finalised, the smart contract pays USDC to the holders' wallets within minutes — no withdrawal fees beyond Polygon network gas. Kalshi settles in USD via CFTC clearance, Betfair in account currency net of commission, Manifold in play-money mana with no cash-out.

FAQ

Is this market available outside the US?

PolyGram is available in most jurisdictions where Polymarket isn't directly accessible. Polymarket itself is geo-blocked in the US/UK/EU. Always check local regulations.

How does resolution work?

Through the UMA Optimistic Oracle on Polygon: a proposer submits the outcome, a two-hour challenge window opens, and USDC payouts settle automatically once the result is final.

What's the difference between YES and NO shares?

A YES share pays $1.00 if the event happens, $0 otherwise. A NO share pays $1.00 if the event doesn't happen. The market price between 0¢ and 100¢ is the implied probability.

What does it cost to trade on PolyGram?

Zero. PolyGram routes every order to the live Polymarket order book; the only cost is the Polygon network fee, typically under $0.01 per transaction.

How reliable are the quoted odds?

The YES/NO percentages are the live mid-prices of the Polymarket order book. On deep markets they move every few seconds; on thinner ones you'll see short plateaus.