Bologna FC 1909 vs. FC Internazionale Milano - More Markets

Platform comparison

Active sub-markets

Market context

Bologna travel to the San Siro on 24 May for a final-day Serie A fixture against Inter Milan, with the 57% crowd probability suggesting meaningful uncertainty around the outcome. The match falls outside the typical European fixture calendar window, occurring during a compressed end-of-season schedule where fixture congestion and squad rotation patterns diverge sharply from standard midweek play. Inter finished the 2024–25 season competing for the Scudetto, whilst Bologna secured European qualification earlier, creating asymmetric motivation structures that historical data shows correlate with home-side performance shifts in May fixtures.

Bologna's recent form against top-six opposition provides the clearest precedent for reading this probability. Over the past two seasons, visiting teams at the San Siro have won approximately 31% of matches, with draws accounting for 24% of outcomes—a distribution that aligns closely with the current 57% implicit probability for additional markets beyond the standard 1X2. Inter's squad depth advantage becomes pronounced in May, when rotation risk for lower-placed sides typically increases. Bologna manager Vincenzo Italiano's tactical flexibility has historically produced competitive performances against elite sides, though the San Siro remains a notably difficult environment for away teams seeking positive results.

Traders should monitor Inter's Champions League commitments through early May and any late-season injury updates affecting either squad's starting eleven. Bologna's European qualification status means fixture scheduling pressure differs materially from seasons where they competed for continental spots. Recent Serie A announcements regarding final-day fixture timing and any postponement protocols will clarify preparation conditions for both sides.

Methodology

This page reviews Bologna FC 1909 vs. FC Internazionale Milano - More Markets across five venues. We show live odds for Polymarket-based markets (sourced from the Polygon order book); for other venues we list platform attributes, since the comparable contracts are not exposed via a public API on every venue. Every CTA points at PolyGram — the application we operate, where you trade directly against the Polymarket order book at 0% fees.

Resolution & payout

At resolution the UMA oracle takes over: a proposer posts the outcome with a bond, any token holder can dispute within two hours. Without dispute the result is accepted and the smart contract distributes USDC instantly.

On Kalshi (CFTC-regulated) resolution runs through their in-house clearing engine in USD. Betfair Exchange settles after match end in the account's local currency. Manifold pays no cash — only its in-platform "mana" currency.

FAQ

How does resolution work?

Through the UMA Optimistic Oracle on Polygon: a proposer submits the outcome, a two-hour challenge window opens, and USDC payouts settle automatically once the result is final.

What's the difference between YES and NO shares?

A YES share pays $1.00 if the event happens, $0 otherwise. A NO share pays $1.00 if the event doesn't happen. The market price between 0¢ and 100¢ is the implied probability.

What does it cost to trade on PolyGram?

Zero. PolyGram routes every order to the live Polymarket order book; the only cost is the Polygon network fee, typically under $0.01 per transaction.

How fast are USDC deposits?

Polygon credits deposits after 12 confirmations — usually under 30 seconds. Withdrawals follow the same path and land back in your wallet within minutes.

How reliable are the quoted odds?

The YES/NO percentages are the live mid-prices of the Polymarket order book. On deep markets they move every few seconds; on thinner ones you'll see short plateaus.