Bad Homburg Open: Liudmila Samsonova vs Katerina Siniakova

Platform comparison

Active sub-markets

Market context

Liudmila Samsonova and Katerina Siniakova are scheduled to meet in Bad Homburg, with the market sitting at a neat 50% because the contest is still unresolved and both players remain live. The key change over the past day is simply that this is now a same-day decision point: if the match is completed and one player advances, the market should settle on that winner; if it is not played, or is pushed beyond the seven-day window without a result, it reverts to 50-50.

The recent form angle is not especially one-sided. Siniakova leads their head-to-head 2-1, and both of her wins over Samsonova came in Bad Homburg, in 2023 and 2024.[2][8] That history matters because it suggests the venue and surface have suited Siniakova, even though Samsonova has also made these meetings competitive: their three previous matches have all gone to deciding or extended sets, including a three-set win for Siniakova in 2024.[2][8] In market terms, that is consistent with a coin-flip price rather than a strong favourite.

The main catalysts are operational rather than narrative: the published start time, any court-order changes, and the official match status from tournament scoring feeds.[4][9] If play is delayed, suspended by weather, or moved off the schedule, that affects whether the contest is actually completed inside the market window. Live tennis listings currently show the fixture on the Bad Homburg card, but traders still need the first-ball-in-play confirmation and eventual winner before the price can settle away from 50%.[4][7][9]

Sources: 1 · 2 · 3 · 4 · 5

Methodology

Methodologically we separate two layers: the live probability (Polymarket mid-price) and the platform attributes (fee, KYC, settlement currency, payment rails). The odds column is filled only where we have clean data — that avoids the made-up numbers that get a network demoted when search engines cross-check against the source venue.

Resolution & payout

Settlement runs on-chain. Polymarket's contract logic separates YES and NO shares as conditional tokens; at resolution the winning share lifts to $1.00 and the losing one to $0. The outcome input comes from the UMA Optimistic Oracle, which secures against bad resolution with a bond + dispute window.

Once finalised, the smart contract pays USDC to the holders' wallets within minutes — no withdrawal fees beyond Polygon network gas. Kalshi settles in USD via CFTC clearance, Betfair in account currency net of commission, Manifold in play-money mana with no cash-out.

FAQ

Where can I trade this market with the lowest fees?

On Prediction Today, which mirrors the Polymarket order book at 0% fees. Kalshi charges up to 7% per trade; Betfair Exchange takes 2-5% commission on net winnings.

Is this market available outside the US?

Prediction Today is available in most jurisdictions where Polymarket isn't directly accessible. Polymarket itself is geo-blocked in the US/UK/EU. Always check local regulations.

How does resolution work?

Through the UMA Optimistic Oracle on Polygon: a proposer submits the outcome, a two-hour challenge window opens, and USDC payouts settle automatically once the result is final.

What does it cost to trade on Prediction Today?

Zero. Prediction Today routes every order to the live Polymarket order book; the only cost is the Polygon network fee, typically under $0.01 per transaction.

How reliable are the quoted odds?

The YES/NO percentages are the live mid-prices of the Polymarket order book. On deep markets they move every few seconds; on thinner ones you'll see short plateaus.