LoL: Maryville University vs Conviction (BO3) - North American Challengers League Playoffs

Platform comparison

Active sub-markets

Market context

Maryville University and Conviction were scheduled to meet in the NACL playoffs on 20 May, but the market is still showing 0% YES with the settlement window running through early 21 May UTC. That usually points to an outcome where the match has not been completed, rather than a clean pre-match view on who would win. By the market rules, if the series is not played at all, ends in a tie, or slips more than seven days past the scheduled date without a winner, it resolves 50-50 instead of to either team.

The last comparable meeting in March went the distance, with Maryville taking a 2-1 win over Conviction in the NACL 2026 Split 1 group stage. That result matters because it shows the pairing can be competitive over a best-of-three, even though Maryville entered that match with the higher Liquipedia ranking and has the recent head-to-head edge. The broader frame is that both sides have already been active in the same NACL season, so this is not a novelty matchup; past results suggest a live series is plausible if the bracket proceeds as normal.

For today’s outlook, the main catalysts are straightforward: whether the upper-bracket quarter-final is actually played, whether any roster changes are announced before draft, and whether the league posts an updated schedule or postponement notice. Recent listing pages from Sofascore and GosuGamers still tie the fixture to 20 May, but no completed result is reflected in the market data provided here. If the event is rescheduled within seven days, the settlement still has a path to a team winner; if not, the 50-50 fallback becomes the relevant outcome.

Sources: 1 · 2 · 3 · 4 · 5

Methodology

This page reviews LoL: Maryville University vs Conviction (BO3) - North American Challengers League Playoffs across five venues. We show live odds for Polymarket-based markets (sourced from the Polygon order book); for other venues we list platform attributes, since the comparable contracts are not exposed via a public API on every venue. Every CTA points at PolyGram — the application we operate, where you trade directly against the Polymarket order book at 0% fees.

Resolution & payout

Settlement runs on-chain. Polymarket's contract logic separates YES and NO shares as conditional tokens; at resolution the winning share lifts to $1.00 and the losing one to $0. The outcome input comes from the UMA Optimistic Oracle, which secures against bad resolution with a bond + dispute window.

Once finalised, the smart contract pays USDC to the holders' wallets within minutes — no withdrawal fees beyond Polygon network gas. Kalshi settles in USD via CFTC clearance, Betfair in account currency net of commission, Manifold in play-money mana with no cash-out.

FAQ

Where can I trade this market with the lowest fees?

On PolyGram, which mirrors the Polymarket order book at 0% fees. Kalshi charges up to 7% per trade; Betfair Exchange takes 2-5% commission on net winnings.

Is this market available outside the US?

PolyGram is available in most jurisdictions where Polymarket isn't directly accessible. Polymarket itself is geo-blocked in the US/UK/EU. Always check local regulations.

What's the difference between YES and NO shares?

A YES share pays $1.00 if the event happens, $0 otherwise. A NO share pays $1.00 if the event doesn't happen. The market price between 0¢ and 100¢ is the implied probability.

What does it cost to trade on PolyGram?

Zero. PolyGram routes every order to the live Polymarket order book; the only cost is the Polygon network fee, typically under $0.01 per transaction.

Do I need to KYC for this market?

Not under $1,500 of lifetime trading volume. Above that threshold, PolyGram triggers a quick verification flow that finishes in minutes.