LoL: The Bandits vs ZennIT (BO3) - Road Of Legends Regular Season

Platform comparison

Market context

The Bandits’ Road Of Legends match against ZennIT has effectively already turned into a completed-result market, with match listings showing The Bandits winning 2-0 in the Summer 2026 meeting and past head-to-head data also recording a Bandits victory over ZennIT in a best-of-three earlier in the year.[1][2] With the crowd-implied price at 100% YES, the market is aligning with a finished outcome rather than an unresolved live-schedule risk, which matters because the settlement rule only shifts to 50-50 if the game was not played, ended level, or was delayed beyond seven days without a winner.

Recent comparable cases point the same way: this pairing has been played as a normal BO3 rather than being left hanging by postponement or forfeiture, and published results pages have already captured decisive series scores for both the summer and winter Road Of Legends contexts.[1][2] That makes the main interpretive lens straightforward: traders are likely reading the market as a near-certain Bandits resolution because the underlying fixture appears to have produced a clear winner, not because of any open competitive uncertainty.

The main catalysts to watch are administrative rather than sporting: final bracket or league confirmation, any official reschedule notice, and whether the organiser records the series as completed in the official standings before the settlement window closes.[3] If there were to be a correction, it would most likely come from a late change to the result status, a rare replay/void decision, or an update showing the match was not officially counted; absent that, the existing result pages leave little room for a different settlement.[1][3]

Sources: 1 · 2 · 3

Methodology

This page reviews LoL: The Bandits vs ZennIT (BO3) - Road Of Legends Regular Season across five venues. The live probability is the Polymarket mid-price, sourced directly from the on-chain Polygon order book; the comparison columns benchmark each venue on fee structure, KYC, settlement currency and payment rails. Every CTA routes to Prediction Today, which mirrors the Polymarket order book at 0% fees.

Resolution & payout

Settlement runs on-chain. Polymarket's contract logic separates YES and NO shares as conditional tokens; at resolution the winning share lifts to $1.00 and the losing one to $0. The outcome input comes from the UMA Optimistic Oracle, which secures against bad resolution with a bond + dispute window.

Once finalised, the smart contract pays USDC to the holders' wallets within minutes — no withdrawal fees beyond Polygon network gas. Kalshi settles in USD via CFTC clearance, Betfair in account currency net of commission, Manifold in play-money mana with no cash-out.

FAQ

Where can I trade this market with the lowest fees?

Polymarket is geo-blocked in the US/UK/EU. The easiest 0%-fee broker into the same order book is Prediction Today. Kalshi charges up to 7% per trade; Betfair Exchange takes 2-5% commission on net winnings.

Is this market available outside the US?

Polymarket itself is geo-blocked in the US/UK/EU. Always check the legal status of prediction markets in your jurisdiction before trading.

What does Polymarket cost to trade?

Polymarket itself charges 0% — the only cost is the Polygon network fee, typically under $0.01 per transaction. Off-chain venues like Kalshi or Betfair charge 2-7% commission.

How fast are USDC deposits?

Polygon credits deposits after 12 confirmations — usually under 30 seconds. Withdrawals follow the same path and land back in your wallet within minutes.

How reliable are the quoted odds?

The YES/NO percentages are the live mid-prices of the Polymarket order book. On deep markets they move every few seconds; on thinner ones you'll see short plateaus.