Counter-Strike: Team Falcons vs M80 (BO3) - CS Asia Championships Group A

Platform comparison

Active sub-markets

Market context

Falcons have already cleared the matchup on the server: recent results show a straight two-map win over M80 in Shanghai, with Falcons advancing from the Group A upper bracket and M80 dropping back into the lower side. That leaves the market effectively settled in real-world terms, even though the crowd-implied price remains pinned at 100% for Falcons. BO3.gg’s match page shows the series ended 2-0, while Field Level Media reported Falcons “swept M80” after beating BC.Game earlier in the group.

For market reading, this is the kind of spot where live price can lag confirmed results only if the exchange has not yet processed the outcome. In comparable CS2 best-of-three markets, once the series is marked complete and multiple results sources agree, the correct side tends to be functionally certain unless there is a scoring dispute or technical issue. Here, the practical question is not form or map pool, but whether the match status is fully recorded before the settlement window closes.

The main catalysts to watch are official bracket updates, match completion status, and any event-side announcement about protest, forfeit or replay. The CS Asia Championships report from Field Level Media already lists Falcons as having swept M80, which makes a post-match reversal unlikely absent a formal ruling. If the organiser and results feeds remain aligned, the market should resolve to Falcons rather than drift towards the 50-50 fallback.

Sources: 1 · 2 · 3 · 4 · 5

Methodology

Methodologically we separate two layers: the live probability (Polymarket mid-price) and the platform attributes (fee, KYC, settlement currency, payment rails). The odds column is filled only where we have clean data — that avoids the made-up numbers that get a network demoted when search engines cross-check against the source venue.

Resolution & payout

Settlement runs on-chain. Polymarket's contract logic separates YES and NO shares as conditional tokens; at resolution the winning share lifts to $1.00 and the losing one to $0. The outcome input comes from the UMA Optimistic Oracle, which secures against bad resolution with a bond + dispute window.

Once finalised, the smart contract pays USDC to the holders' wallets within minutes — no withdrawal fees beyond Polygon network gas. Kalshi settles in USD via CFTC clearance, Betfair in account currency net of commission, Manifold in play-money mana with no cash-out.

FAQ

Where can I trade this market with the lowest fees?

On PolyGram, which mirrors the Polymarket order book at 0% fees. Kalshi charges up to 7% per trade; Betfair Exchange takes 2-5% commission on net winnings.

Is this market available outside the US?

PolyGram is available in most jurisdictions where Polymarket isn't directly accessible. Polymarket itself is geo-blocked in the US/UK/EU. Always check local regulations.

How does resolution work?

Through the UMA Optimistic Oracle on Polygon: a proposer submits the outcome, a two-hour challenge window opens, and USDC payouts settle automatically once the result is final.

What's the difference between YES and NO shares?

A YES share pays $1.00 if the event happens, $0 otherwise. A NO share pays $1.00 if the event doesn't happen. The market price between 0¢ and 100¢ is the implied probability.

How fast are USDC deposits?

Polygon credits deposits after 12 confirmations — usually under 30 seconds. Withdrawals follow the same path and land back in your wallet within minutes.