Roland Garros, Qualification ATP: Vilius Gaubas vs Pablo Llamas Ruiz

Platform comparison

Active sub-markets

Market context

Vilius Gaubas and Pablo Llamas Ruiz were scheduled to meet in Roland Garros qualifying on Friday, but the market is still at 0% YES, which points to no priced outcome yet rather than a leaning to either player. The relevant context is that this is a best-of-three clay-court qualifier at the French Open, where a single match can swing sharply on first-serve percentage, return pressure and who handles the longer baseline exchanges better. Their previous meeting at Roland Garros qualifying in 2025 went to Pablo Llamas Ruiz in three sets, with ATP head-to-head records the encounter as a 6-0, 3-6, 6-2 result on outdoor clay.

For comparison, the live pricing available from sports books has generally made Llamas Ruiz the shorter-priced player, with one recent board quoting him around 1.30 and Gaubas around 3.20. That fits the wider ranking picture in which Gaubas is the higher-ranked player on the ATP scale, but Llamas Ruiz has already shown he can win this exact qualifying match-up on this surface. In a market like this, the main read-through is not the headline ranking gap but whether the clay conditions and match rhythm favour Llamas Ruiz’s proven result or open a path for Gaubas to reverse it.

The key catalyst is simply whether the match is actually staged within the settlement window and, if so, whether an ATP result is published promptly. FanDuel and Kalshi both had listings tied to the 22 May schedule, while SofaScore also carried the fixture as a qualifying match at Roland Garros, so any further delay, walkover, or cancellation would matter more than usual given the market’s 50-50 fallback rules. Traders should watch the official draw sheet, court order and ATP match status closely, because in qualifying the outcome can flip from live to void very quickly if scheduling changes.

Sources: 1 · 2 · 3 · 4 · 5

Methodology

Methodologically we separate two layers: the live probability (Polymarket mid-price) and the platform attributes (fee, KYC, settlement currency, payment rails). The odds column is filled only where we have clean data — that avoids the made-up numbers that get a network demoted when search engines cross-check against the source venue.

Resolution & payout

Polymarket-based markets settle through the UMA Optimistic Oracle on Polygon. A proposer submits the outcome, a two-hour challenge window opens, and unchallenged proposals finalise the resolution. Payouts settle automatically in USDC the moment the result is final — no bookmaker, no delay.

Kalshi-based markets settle in USD via the CFTC-regulated clearinghouse. Betfair Exchange settles in GBP/EUR net of commission. Manifold is play-money and does not pay out real funds.

FAQ

Where can I trade this market with the lowest fees?

On PolyGram, which mirrors the Polymarket order book at 0% fees. Kalshi charges up to 7% per trade; Betfair Exchange takes 2-5% commission on net winnings.

How does resolution work?

Through the UMA Optimistic Oracle on Polygon: a proposer submits the outcome, a two-hour challenge window opens, and USDC payouts settle automatically once the result is final.

What does it cost to trade on PolyGram?

Zero. PolyGram routes every order to the live Polymarket order book; the only cost is the Polygon network fee, typically under $0.01 per transaction.

How fast are USDC deposits?

Polygon credits deposits after 12 confirmations — usually under 30 seconds. Withdrawals follow the same path and land back in your wallet within minutes.

How reliable are the quoted odds?

The YES/NO percentages are the live mid-prices of the Polymarket order book. On deep markets they move every few seconds; on thinner ones you'll see short plateaus.