Scotland vs. Brazil - Exact Score

Platform comparison

Active sub-markets

Market context

The FIFA World Cup match between Scotland and Brazil kicks off at Hard Rock Stadium in Miami tonight, with Scotland needing a win to guarantee progression while a draw suffices for Brazil to advance. Over the last 24 hours, market sentiment has tightened slightly as Brazil’s recent defensive solidity—conceding just one goal in two tournament matches—has reinforced their status as clear favourites, pushing the crowd-implied probability for an exact 1-2 scoreline to 6% YES. This low probability reflects the inherent difficulty of pinning down a precise outcome in a high-stakes game where tactical adjustments and individual brilliance often dictate the final tally.

Historically, exact-score markets in World Cup knockout or decisive group games rarely exceed 10% implied probability, even when one team dominates; for instance, Brazil’s 3-0 victory over Haiti earlier in the tournament was priced at just 7% before the match. Comparable cases show that when a team like Brazil, unbeaten in 67 of their last 70 games, faces an underdog needing a win, the most likely scores (1-0, 1-1, 2-1) typically cluster around 8–12%, leaving specific outcomes like 1-2 at the lower end. The current 6% figure aligns with this pattern, suggesting traders view the 1-2 result as plausible but not the dominant expectation.

Traders should monitor Raphinha’s confirmed fitness status, as his potential absence could blunt Brazil’s attacking threat, and watch for late lineup announcements from both squads, which often shift exact-score probabilities within minutes. Additionally, weather conditions in Miami—currently forecast as clear but with a chance of evening rain—could influence goal totals, particularly if Scotland adopts a more aggressive approach knowing a draw is insufficient. Recent tactical analysis from RotoWire highlights Vinicius Junior’s counter-attacking role as a key catalyst, noting that Brazil’s quality and unbeaten head-to-head record against Scotland make a narrow win likely, though not guaranteed [3].

Sources: 1 · 2 · 3 · 4 · 5

Methodology

This page is a comparison snapshot: one live quote (Polymarket), four reference venues with their key attributes, and a single execution path — every trade button routes to Prediction Today, which mirrors the Polymarket order book directly.

Resolution & payout

Settlement runs on-chain. Polymarket's contract logic separates YES and NO shares as conditional tokens; at resolution the winning share lifts to $1.00 and the losing one to $0. The outcome input comes from the UMA Optimistic Oracle, which secures against bad resolution with a bond + dispute window.

Once finalised, the smart contract pays USDC to the holders' wallets within minutes — no withdrawal fees beyond Polygon network gas. Kalshi settles in USD via CFTC clearance, Betfair in account currency net of commission, Manifold in play-money mana with no cash-out.

FAQ

Where can I trade this market with the lowest fees?

On Prediction Today, which mirrors the Polymarket order book at 0% fees. Kalshi charges up to 7% per trade; Betfair Exchange takes 2-5% commission on net winnings.

How does resolution work?

Through the UMA Optimistic Oracle on Polygon: a proposer submits the outcome, a two-hour challenge window opens, and USDC payouts settle automatically once the result is final.

What does it cost to trade on Prediction Today?

Zero. Prediction Today routes every order to the live Polymarket order book; the only cost is the Polygon network fee, typically under $0.01 per transaction.

How fast are USDC deposits?

Polygon credits deposits after 12 confirmations — usually under 30 seconds. Withdrawals follow the same path and land back in your wallet within minutes.

How reliable are the quoted odds?

The YES/NO percentages are the live mid-prices of the Polymarket order book. On deep markets they move every few seconds; on thinner ones you'll see short plateaus.