# of views of MrBeast video day 6?

Platform comparison

Active sub-markets

Market context

MrBeast’s latest upload is still the only thing that matters here: the market settles on the video’s view count after 144 hours, and the tape suggests it has already landed in the upper part of the range. The crowd is pricing 0% for a YES outcome in the sense of the listed current bracket, which usually indicates the observed count has moved beyond the remaining lower bands or the market has become effectively one-sided. In practical terms, day-six view totals on MrBeast videos tend to be heavy-tailed, with an initial burst from launch-day promotion followed by a slower decay, so once a video clears the early surge it often spends the later part of the window grinding upwards rather than jumping between brackets.

The clearest comparables are his recent large-format uploads, which have frequently built most of their 144-hour total in the first two to three days, then added a smaller but still material tail through day six. MrBeast’s channel scale remains extreme by YouTube standards, with hundreds of millions of subscribers across his ecosystem and a long record of multi-million view accumulation over a single week. That matters because even modest changes in retention, homepage distribution, or Shorts spillover can shift a video across a bracket once the market is near a boundary; the resolution rule also favours the higher band if the final count lands exactly between two ranges.

For the next 24-48 hours, traders should watch the public view counter on the channel page, any follow-up post from MrBeast, and whether the video receives a second-wave push through community posts, Shorts, or collaborator accounts. Recent commentary on YouTube distribution, including vidIQ’s discussion of MrBeast’s declining per-video views and the platform’s increasingly spread-out attention, is relevant mainly as background: it points to a thinner tail than in earlier eras, but not necessarily to a collapse in week-one totals. The key dependency remains simple: how much incremental traffic the video can still pull before the 144-hour clock closes.

Sources: 1 · 2 · 3 · 4 · 5

Methodology

This page is a comparison snapshot: one live quote (Polymarket), four reference venues with their key attributes, and a single execution path — every trade button routes to PolyGram, which mirrors the Polymarket order book directly.

Resolution & payout

Settlement runs on-chain. Polymarket's contract logic separates YES and NO shares as conditional tokens; at resolution the winning share lifts to $1.00 and the losing one to $0. The outcome input comes from the UMA Optimistic Oracle, which secures against bad resolution with a bond + dispute window.

Once finalised, the smart contract pays USDC to the holders' wallets within minutes — no withdrawal fees beyond Polygon network gas. Kalshi settles in USD via CFTC clearance, Betfair in account currency net of commission, Manifold in play-money mana with no cash-out.

FAQ

Where can I trade this market with the lowest fees?

On PolyGram, which mirrors the Polymarket order book at 0% fees. Kalshi charges up to 7% per trade; Betfair Exchange takes 2-5% commission on net winnings.

How does resolution work?

Through the UMA Optimistic Oracle on Polygon: a proposer submits the outcome, a two-hour challenge window opens, and USDC payouts settle automatically once the result is final.

What does it cost to trade on PolyGram?

Zero. PolyGram routes every order to the live Polymarket order book; the only cost is the Polygon network fee, typically under $0.01 per transaction.

How fast are USDC deposits?

Polygon credits deposits after 12 confirmations — usually under 30 seconds. Withdrawals follow the same path and land back in your wallet within minutes.

Do I need to KYC for this market?

Not under $1,500 of lifetime trading volume. Above that threshold, PolyGram triggers a quick verification flow that finishes in minutes.