# of views of MrBeast video day 5?

Platform comparison

Active sub-markets

Market context

The latest MrBeast upload has now had most of its first five days of exposure, so the market is effectively reading the accumulated pace rather than early launch noise. With the crowd currently assigning 0% to YES, traders are signalling that the video is not expected to land in the bracket being implied by the market outcome, or that the relevant band is already considered unreachable before the 120-hour window closes.

The closest reference point is MrBeast’s usual scale rather than any single viral outlier: his recent uploads still draw tens of millions of views very quickly, but the distribution has been uneven, with some videos clearing major milestones fast and others slowing after the first 24-48 hours. That fits the wider debate around whether YouTube views are being spread more thinly across more creators, a point raised in a recent discussion of his view trends on YouTube, and echoed in reporting that MrBeast himself pushed back on claims of a sharp collapse in audience demand. The market’s current pricing suggests traders see the day-five count as already broadly determined by that second-day slope.

What matters from here is whether MrBeast posts again, promotes the upload elsewhere, or benefits from any algorithmic re-push on Home and Suggested. The resolution source is the views counter on his channel, so there is little ambiguity once the 120-hour window expires; the main live variable is the rate of late tail growth. If the video is part of a larger upload sequence or a format with strong replay value, that can matter more than headline launch numbers, particularly when early commentary frames the channel as “down” but the live counter still shows substantial absolute volume.

Sources: 1 · 2 · 3 · 4 · 5

Methodology

Methodologically we separate two layers: the live probability (Polymarket mid-price) and the platform attributes (fee, KYC, settlement currency, payment rails). The odds column is filled only where we have clean data — that avoids the made-up numbers that get a network demoted when search engines cross-check against the source venue.

Resolution & payout

Polymarket-based markets settle through the UMA Optimistic Oracle on Polygon. A proposer submits the outcome, a two-hour challenge window opens, and unchallenged proposals finalise the resolution. Payouts settle automatically in USDC the moment the result is final — no bookmaker, no delay.

Kalshi-based markets settle in USD via the CFTC-regulated clearinghouse. Betfair Exchange settles in GBP/EUR net of commission. Manifold is play-money and does not pay out real funds.

FAQ

Where can I trade this market with the lowest fees?

On PolyGram, which mirrors the Polymarket order book at 0% fees. Kalshi charges up to 7% per trade; Betfair Exchange takes 2-5% commission on net winnings.

Is this market available outside the US?

PolyGram is available in most jurisdictions where Polymarket isn't directly accessible. Polymarket itself is geo-blocked in the US/UK/EU. Always check local regulations.

What's the difference between YES and NO shares?

A YES share pays $1.00 if the event happens, $0 otherwise. A NO share pays $1.00 if the event doesn't happen. The market price between 0¢ and 100¢ is the implied probability.

How fast are USDC deposits?

Polygon credits deposits after 12 confirmations — usually under 30 seconds. Withdrawals follow the same path and land back in your wallet within minutes.

How reliable are the quoted odds?

The YES/NO percentages are the live mid-prices of the Polymarket order book. On deep markets they move every few seconds; on thinner ones you'll see short plateaus.