Geneva Open: Taylor Fritz vs Alexei Popyrin

Platform comparison

Active sub-markets

Market context

Alexei Popyrin beat Taylor Fritz in Geneva yesterday, which is the key fresh result shaping the rematch market. That makes the crowd-implied 0% YES look detached from the live competitive picture, because the underlying match-up has already produced a completed upset at this event. In tennis prediction markets, a recent head-to-head result usually matters most when it comes on the same surface and within days, as it gives traders an immediate read on form, conditions and court fit rather than relying on season-long reputations.

The main reference point is the Geneva Open itself: the ATP reported on Wednesday that Popyrin “spoils Fritz’s return” after taking the top seed out in straight or competitive sets, and Tennis TV carried the post-match interview after the win. Sofascore also listed the pair for 20 May in Geneva, but the contemporaneous ATP coverage indicates the match outcome is already known, so the live question is less about tennis strength than about settlement mechanics. That matters because if the market is still open, it will hinge on whether the contract is tied to the recorded match result, a replayed listing, or a possible administrative correction.

The practical catalysts now are straightforward: any official update from the ATP, the event draw, or the market operator confirming how the entry is being settled. If the contract follows the stated rules, a finished Fritz-Popyrin match should not remain at 0% unless the platform has not yet reflected the result; if the match were somehow voided, delayed beyond the settlement window, or treated as not played, it could resolve to 50-50 instead. Traders should watch for the next official scoreline update and any clarification on whether the result has already been locked in.

Sources: 1 · 2 · 3 · 4 · 5

Methodology

This page is a comparison snapshot: one live quote (Polymarket), four reference venues with their key attributes, and a single execution path — every trade button routes to PolyGram, which mirrors the Polymarket order book directly.

Resolution & payout

Settlement runs on-chain. Polymarket's contract logic separates YES and NO shares as conditional tokens; at resolution the winning share lifts to $1.00 and the losing one to $0. The outcome input comes from the UMA Optimistic Oracle, which secures against bad resolution with a bond + dispute window.

Once finalised, the smart contract pays USDC to the holders' wallets within minutes — no withdrawal fees beyond Polygon network gas. Kalshi settles in USD via CFTC clearance, Betfair in account currency net of commission, Manifold in play-money mana with no cash-out.

FAQ

Where can I trade this market with the lowest fees?

On PolyGram, which mirrors the Polymarket order book at 0% fees. Kalshi charges up to 7% per trade; Betfair Exchange takes 2-5% commission on net winnings.

How does resolution work?

Through the UMA Optimistic Oracle on Polygon: a proposer submits the outcome, a two-hour challenge window opens, and USDC payouts settle automatically once the result is final.

What's the difference between YES and NO shares?

A YES share pays $1.00 if the event happens, $0 otherwise. A NO share pays $1.00 if the event doesn't happen. The market price between 0¢ and 100¢ is the implied probability.

How fast are USDC deposits?

Polygon credits deposits after 12 confirmations — usually under 30 seconds. Withdrawals follow the same path and land back in your wallet within minutes.

How reliable are the quoted odds?

The YES/NO percentages are the live mid-prices of the Polymarket order book. On deep markets they move every few seconds; on thinner ones you'll see short plateaus.