Platform comparison
| Platform | YES odds | NO odds | Fee | KYC | Settlement | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Polymarket (via Prediction Today) Pick polygram.ink (preferred broker) |
69% | 31% | 0% (USDC on-chain) | No-KYC up to $1,500 | USDC, auto via UMA oracle | Live odds → |
Polymarket (direct) polymarket.com |
69% | 31% | 0% | Geo-blocked in US/UK/EU | USDC, on-chain | Live odds → |
Kalshi kalshi.com |
— | — | Up to 7% per trade | US-only, KYC required | USD | Live odds → |
Betfair Exchange betfair.com |
— | — | 2-5% commission | Full KYC from first trade | GBP / EUR | Live odds → |
Manifold Markets manifold.markets |
— | — | Play-money (mana) | None — play-money | Mana (no cash-out) | Live odds → |
Outcome probabilities
Current market-implied probability for each outcome, from the live order book.
| Outcome | Probability |
|---|---|
| Both Teams Slay a Dragon | 69% |
| Both Teams Slay a Dragon | 69% |
| Both Teams Slay a Dragon | 68% |
| Game Handicap: TL (-1.5) vs Deep Cross Gaming (+1.5) | 67% |
| Total Kills Over/Under 27.5 in Game 2? | 64% |
| Total Kills Over/Under 27.5 in Game 3? | 63% |
| O/U 3.5 Games | 63% |
| Total Kills Over/Under 27.5 in Game 1? | 62% |
| Both Teams Slay Baron Nashor | 53% |
| Any Player Quadra Kill | 53% |
| Total Kills Over/Under 30.5 in Game 2? | 53% |
| Any Player Quadra Kill | 53% |
| Both Teams Slay Baron Nashor | 52% |
| Any Player Penta Kill | 52% |
| Total Kills Over/Under 30.5 in Game 3? | 52% |
| Both Teams Destroy Inhibitors | 51% |
| Total Kills Over/Under 27.5 in Game 4? | 51% |
| Both Teams Destroy Inhibitors | 51% |
| First Blood in Game 1? | 50% |
| Odd/Even Total Kills | 50% |
| Odd/Even Total Kills | 50% |
| Odd/Even Total Kills | 50% |
| Odd/Even Total Kills | 50% |
| First Blood in Game 4? | 50% |
| Total Kills Over/Under 33.5 in Game 4? | 50% |
| Total Kills Over/Under 30.5 in Game 4? | 50% |
| Any Player Penta Kill | 50% |
| First Blood in Game 3? | 50% |
| Odd/Even Total Kills | 50% |
| Total Kills Over/Under 30.5 in Game 1? | 48% |
| Both Teams Slay a Dragon | 44% |
| Both Teams Slay a Dragon | 44% |
| Game 4 Winner | 39% |
| Game Handicap: TL (-2.5) vs Deep Cross Gaming (+2.5) | 35% |
| Total Kills Over/Under 33.5 in Game 1? | 34% |
| Total Kills Over/Under 33.5 in Game 2? | 34% |
| Game 2 Winner | 34% |
| Total Kills Over/Under 33.5 in Game 3? | 33% |
| Game 1 Winner | 33% |
| First Blood in Game 2? | 32% |
| Game 3 Winner | 32% |
| Both Teams Slay Baron Nashor | 28% |
| Any Player Quadra Kill | 28% |
| Both Teams Slay Baron Nashor | 28% |
| Any Player Quadra Kill | 28% |
| Both Teams Slay Baron Nashor | 28% |
| Any Player Quadra Kill | 28% |
| Both Teams Destroy Inhibitors | 27% |
| Both Teams Destroy Inhibitors | 27% |
| Both Teams Destroy Inhibitors | 27% |
| Any Player Penta Kill | 26% |
| Any Player Penta Kill | 26% |
| Any Player Penta Kill | 26% |
| O/U 4.5 Games | 24% |
| Match Winner | 19% |
Market context
The lower-bracket semifinal at the Mid-Season Invitational Play-In pits Deep Cross Gaming against Team Liquid in a decisive BO5, scheduled to begin at 4:00 AM ET on 29 June. Both sides entered this clash with identical 0-3 records from their opening rounds, stripping away any pre-tournament favouritism and forcing a pure reset on performance. Team Liquid are technically favoured due to stronger initial opponents and individual standout moments, yet their 0-3 loss to T1 reveals a volatile, flawed squad that has offered little inspiration. Deep Cross Gaming, meanwhile, displayed weak macro play early on, cementing their underdog status, though the match is likely closer than bookmakers anticipate, with Deep Cross capable of stealing at least one map[1].
Historical MSI play-in cases where both teams started with 0-3 losses show that crowd-implied 50% probabilities often mask a narrow but real edge for the side with better individual mechanics, even when macro is shaky. In such scenarios, the favourite wins the match but rarely dominates cleanly, mirroring the current 50-50 sentiment where the market correctly identifies Team Liquid’s higher win probability while acknowledging Deep Cross’s map-taking potential[1]. This pattern suggests the 50% price is not a true equilibrium but a reflection of deep uncertainty about whether Team Liquid’s flaws will be exploited enough to force a longer series.
Traders should monitor the official MSI schedule for any delay beyond the 7-day settlement window, as a cancellation or tie would trigger the 50-50 resolution clause. Watch for in-game announcements regarding player substitutions or roster changes, which could shift momentum abruptly, and track live macro decisions in the first map to gauge whether Deep Cross can replicate their earlier map-steal potential against a struggling Team Liquid[1]. The key dependency is whether Team Liquid’s volatility, noted in their T1 loss, translates into a series-long collapse or merely a messy victory[1].
Methodology
We track LoL: Deep Cross Gaming vs Team Liquid (BO5) - Mid-Season Invitational Play-In across the five venues with material prediction-market liquidity. The probability shown is the live Polymarket mid; the comparison rows summarise how each venue treats the underlying contract — fees, KYC thresholds, settlement currency, deposit options. The highlighted row marks the cheapest route into Polymarket's order book.
Resolution & payout
Settlement runs on-chain. Polymarket's contract logic separates YES and NO shares as conditional tokens; at resolution the winning share lifts to $1.00 and the losing one to $0. The outcome input comes from the UMA Optimistic Oracle, which secures against bad resolution with a bond + dispute window.
Once finalised, the smart contract pays USDC to the holders' wallets within minutes — no withdrawal fees beyond Polygon network gas. Kalshi settles in USD via CFTC clearance, Betfair in account currency net of commission, Manifold in play-money mana with no cash-out.
FAQ
- How does resolution work?
- Through the UMA Optimistic Oracle on Polygon: a proposer submits the outcome, a two-hour challenge window opens, and USDC payouts settle automatically once the result is final.
- What's the difference between YES and NO shares?
- A YES share pays $1.00 if the event happens, $0 otherwise. A NO share pays $1.00 if the event doesn't happen. The market price between 0¢ and 100¢ is the implied probability.
- What does Polymarket cost to trade?
- Polymarket itself charges 0% — the only cost is the Polygon network fee, typically under $0.01 per transaction. Off-chain venues like Kalshi or Betfair charge 2-7% commission.
- How fast are USDC deposits?
- Polygon credits deposits after 12 confirmations — usually under 30 seconds. Withdrawals follow the same path and land back in your wallet within minutes.
- Do I need to KYC for this market?
- On Polymarket directly, no — it's wallet-based. Intermediary brokers like Prediction Today trigger KYC only above $1,500 of lifetime trading volume; under that you trade pseudonymously with a single wallet address.
Trade LoL: Deep Cross Gaming vs Team Liquid (BO5) - Mid-Se… on Prediction Today
Live order book, 0% fees, USDC settlement in seconds.
Open live market →