Counter-Strike: Aurora Gaming vs 9z (BO3) - IEM Cologne Major Stage 3

Platform comparison

Active sub-markets

Market context

Aurora Gaming face 9z in a best-of-three Counter-Strike encounter at IEM Cologne's Major Stage 3 on 14 June. The match sits at 47% implied probability for Aurora, suggesting near-parity in trader assessment despite the two teams operating at markedly different competitive tiers. No material shifts in roster status or recent tournament results have emerged in the past 48 hours to explain movement from earlier pricing.

Aurora Gaming competes primarily in CIS-region tournaments and qualifiers, whilst 9z represents Argentina's top-tier competitive scene. Historical matchups between regional powerhouses and CIS-based squads at major events show considerable variance; outcomes depend heavily on map pool compatibility and whether either team has secured recent LAN experience. The 47% mark reflects genuine uncertainty rather than a consensus lean, consistent with how prediction markets price matches between teams with limited direct head-to-head history at this calibre of event.

Traders should monitor the official IEM schedule for any format changes or postponements, particularly given the tournament's multi-stage structure. Roster confirmations and last-minute stand-in announcements typically surface 24–48 hours before match time. The settlement window closes at 20:30 UTC on 14 June, allowing roughly ten hours post-scheduled start time; delays beyond seven days trigger the 50-50 resolution clause. Any forfeiture or technical disqualification would resolve according to the stated terms rather than the match result itself.

Methodology

Methodologically we separate two layers: the live probability (Polymarket mid-price) and the platform attributes (fee, KYC, settlement currency, payment rails). The odds column is filled only where we have clean data — that avoids the made-up numbers that get a network demoted when search engines cross-check against the source venue.

Resolution & payout

Settlement runs on-chain. Polymarket's contract logic separates YES and NO shares as conditional tokens; at resolution the winning share lifts to $1.00 and the losing one to $0. The outcome input comes from the UMA Optimistic Oracle, which secures against bad resolution with a bond + dispute window.

Once finalised, the smart contract pays USDC to the holders' wallets within minutes — no withdrawal fees beyond Polygon network gas. Kalshi settles in USD via CFTC clearance, Betfair in account currency net of commission, Manifold in play-money mana with no cash-out.

FAQ

Where can I trade this market with the lowest fees?

On Prediction Today, which mirrors the Polymarket order book at 0% fees. Kalshi charges up to 7% per trade; Betfair Exchange takes 2-5% commission on net winnings.

How does resolution work?

Through the UMA Optimistic Oracle on Polygon: a proposer submits the outcome, a two-hour challenge window opens, and USDC payouts settle automatically once the result is final.

What does it cost to trade on Prediction Today?

Zero. Prediction Today routes every order to the live Polymarket order book; the only cost is the Polygon network fee, typically under $0.01 per transaction.

How fast are USDC deposits?

Polygon credits deposits after 12 confirmations — usually under 30 seconds. Withdrawals follow the same path and land back in your wallet within minutes.

How reliable are the quoted odds?

The YES/NO percentages are the live mid-prices of the Polymarket order book. On deep markets they move every few seconds; on thinner ones you'll see short plateaus.